Welcome
to our first blog, we are 3 exchange students from 3 different countries. Our
group name is Observateurs!
Alice is
studying in Canada but originally comes from Vietnam.
Guillaume
is half French, half Polish but lives in Germany and studies in the Netherlands.
Paul is
French and studies there but got some professional experience in Germany.
We hope
that our international profile will help us to share our perspective throughout
the 4 blogs.
In this
blog, we would like to speak about an international phenomenon that a lot of
people would think is true and show you how limited it might be:
‘’ONLY multinationals
companies can succeed in today’s globalized world!!!’’
BUT SMALL AND MEDIUM COMPANY SIZED ENTERPRISES (SMEs)
CAN BE AS SUCCESFULL THANKS TO ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY, LESS CULTURAL BARRIERS AND
SUPPORTIVE GOVERNEMENTAL ENGAGEMENT.
In
today’s world, globalization is THE current trend, every firm wants to
participate and have their own share out of it. Of course that Coca-Cola, KFC,
Adidas have already internationalized and still conquer the world. It is very
common to think that multinationals are the only players in globalization. In
our first blog, Observateurs will try to demystify this perception and then
prove that SMEs also have a great chance to go global.
Advanced
Technology
Internet
Since the
beginning of public internet usage in the late 1980s, the global coverage has dramatically
increased and its access has become easy and cheap. No company can afford not
to have internet presence, as it is the most cost-effective link to the largest
possible customer base. Although the dependence on this medium of communication
has increased significantly over time, it brought with it the advantage of fast
information transfer and the possibility of simplified connection between
company internal elements like server systems and employees and company
external elements like virtual conferencing with business partners. All these
aspects have empowered entrepreneurs to have an easy access to the market they
are targeting and have a large customer reach at relatively low cost. This
situation diminished the risk of starting a business, as the cost of entry is
becoming ever lower.
Logistics
The
constant increase in efficiency and effectiveness of logistics operations has
changed the global perception of the timeliness of transaction and production. With
every transport route becoming shorter and all production processes becoming
more efficient and thus cheaper, consumers expect decreasing delivery time,
putting competitive pressure on that part of business. Large scale
transportation companies like DHL and UPS take an oligopolistic stance in many
markets, as the entry costs for truck and ship fleets are very high. But
although globalization has lead to limits in this industry, small and medium
size enterprises (SMEs) can make use of those large networks, as they can provide
the service of fast delivery at small transaction volumes. The approach of
faster global transportation is certainly not ecological, but in terms of
bringing supply closer to demand, it has opened a new way of doing business,
where even the most remote consumer can purchase from anywhere at any time.
Cultural
differences
The
decision to go global and enter new markets can be very profitable but can also
cause losses. The risks and chances balance is determined by the strategic
decision and how the firm will implement its business overseas. One important
factor that all enterprises going global need to account for is: cultural differences.
For the multinationals, it seems to be easier for them to prevent this type of
problem thanks to their resources (business intelligence, market analysis,
investment fund, networks). Cultural identity is unique and crafted by the
social beliefs and habits norms of the population in a particular region.
First,
the problem of cultural differences is somehow minimized nowadays thanks to the
importance attributed to education and knowledge in the third world countries.
In fact, most of the actual generation of entrepreneurs can speak at least two
different languages.
Second,
the human capital transfer and easy interconnectivity between countries can
also diminish cultural differences and widen people perspectives and better
understanding of different cultural beliefs. Immigration, travel, social
platform, media diffusion, etc. have played a great role in decreasing barriers
in communication and cultural differences.
Third,
the native people point of view has also changed during the past decade
vis-à-vis investment from abroad. In developing countries, the entry of a new
firm usually means more jobs opportunities for the local habitants and a chance
of improving their quality of life in the first place. Finally, to avoid
failure from cultural differences, SMEs should be aware of this issue and adopt
cautious developmental strategies.
Supportive government engagement
ð Worldwide
organizations
o
Foundation of the WTO in 1994: aims to supervise and
liberalize the international trade. It keeps the countries from closing their
borders and consequently help the companies to think global.
ð Regional
organizations that also help to some regional engagement. As well as the WTO,
these organizations lead the countries to less protectionism and less trade barriers.
o
Free Trade Agreement between 2 or several countries: North
America Free Trade Agreement, ASEAN Free Trade Organization
ð Government
policies that generally support international trade
Subventions
are often dealt to SME in order to help their international development
An
example of SME that chose to go global: Lingo24
Lingo24
is a translation company based in UK. It was founded in 2001 in Scotland (by
Christian Arno, 22) and got global pretty quickly as it was employing people in
France, in China, in New Zealand and in the USA only two years after its
creation. The company is now implanted in 10 countries, it has clients in more
than 60 countries and its turnover reaches 4.67 million Euros in 2009.
Considering
its success, Lingo24 placed number 81 on The Times’ Fast Track 100 List
(fastest growing translation agency in the UK) in May 2011. The company could
even belong now to the flourishing category of micro-multinationals. Indeed,
Lingo24 stays a SME as there are less than 250 employees and the turnover does
not extend 43 million Euros (European Union definition) but it presents some of
the aspects of multinationals mostly because of its internationalization.
Blog Extension
The
confusion that many readers had about whether or not the applicability of our analysis
towards the ability of SMEs to go global is limited for specific industries or
can be applied industry-wide is founded, but we did specify that in most cases
SMEs that are effectively able to reach a global market most often are found in
dynamic tech environments. It is true that some markets are excluded from this
trend, like some local food production sector.
When it
comes to funding for SMEs, some readers were saying we did not give enough
detail about the current situation and were wondering about the ease these
firms have to request proper funding. So as a matter of fact, in Europe, there
is a venture capital fund which actively supports the business processes of
SMEs by giving targeted funding for promising projects. It is very simple to
request such a funding, as it can be done through online applications. The only
possible drawback is that when a project seems risky, the management of the
venture capital fund will require a controlling share in the business, to be
able to channel funds more effectively and avoid wasteful use of resources,
especially in uncertain market conditions.
Many of you stated that our example was good and illustrated well the phenomenon we wanted to speak about: SME’s can make it global. However, you also pointed the fact the translation industry, especially on the internet, represents a niche and consequently an exception. We actually understand what you are saying: doing business with/on the internet makes it easier and SME’s certainly would have difficulties to go global in other industries. We also precized that this business shift is actually possible thanks to the development of new technologies and the internet is the main element of the technological revolution that we lately experienced.
I agree with you that advanced technology, reduced cultural differences and supportive government engagement could somehow help SMEs to go into global market. However, I think that the above factors are only helpful in certain industries which need medium size of capital, human resources and time to expand globally like the example giving in the blog. Your team has used translation industry as an example. Translation industry is rather simple compared to other industries. To expand, what the translation company mainly need is recruiting more staff as translation company mainly provides services of translating language. They do not need to buy a lot of machines and equipment like garment industry. Also, they do not have to purchase or lease land for manufacturing and retailing etc. Moreover, unlike industries like IT, sportswear and fast food, there is less MNCs in this particular industry. That is why translation company can go into the global market easily. Nevertheless, if the company who want to go worldwide successfully is in IT industry, it is extremely difficult because they do not have enough capital to spend on research and development to improve their advanced product to compete against the MNCs like IBM. Therefore, even with the help of advanced technology and government support, it is difficult for them to enter global market especially in those industries need large amount of capital with the exits of several powerful MNCs.
ReplyDeleteLove the Observateurs clean layout, it's easy to read, and organized. I enjoyed the optimism of the argument with SMEs having the same ability to grow and succeed as MNCs would. I agree to a certain extent, especially with the cultural influence of globalization based on technology, however I found this comment left by IM_student_51814580 to be even more compelling with the translation industry example. I couldn't agree more with IM.
DeleteIf Observateurs can take on a couple more case studies with SMEs within at least two or three other industries, such as garment, restauranteur, or software industries that require more capital, land, and possibly labor due to internal theft and security, etc and factory output. This would also further concern international management and risk management as compared to the translation industry which is a service that requires a lot less resources. There's a couple different views we can take on with this, either the SMEs have to find a niche in the service industry.. or if Observateurs take on a more general stance with SMEs being able to convert to MNCs equally, it would be paramount to find SMEs in other industries.
Going back to my first point with SMEs being a successor in MNCs, the economic situation we have with globalization is already creating difficult barriers to entry. These SMEs are reluctant to stay afloat its first five years, as with any business. In U.S., even with the help of fair acts, government regulation, policies, tax relief, etc. small businesses in non-service industries and with innovative products must find a sustainable supplier among other costly set-ups. The R&D in this particular type of industry takes a long time after product development and testing before its released into the markets. Once this product is released, the SMEs must think about the returns and price selling points of alternative items in the same market. With the current state of the economy, and more consumers have less disposable income, it would be difficult to say that SMEs stand an equal chance to convert to MNC, especially when they have yet to be established in the market.
I believe if Observateurs continue the research and find other SMEs in several industries, this would hold well in their argument. Thank you for sharing this with us, and I love to see other fellow colleagues preserve their optimism. I will be back again!
Wild-debater 40041074
ReplyDeleteI find this blog very interesting and I think there are good arguments and I agree with the authors. Although multinational corporations are growing along with the globalization I believe that there always will be room for SME:s to succeed in an even more competitive environment. I strongly believe that there are several factors that create competitive advantage for SME:s in the global market. Every company adapt and adjust itself to its surrounding. There are evidence in economic research that innovation, skills of entrepreneurs and networking through building strong relations with suppliers and customers create competitive opportunities. By being creative and finding different niches in different local markets smaller firms can compete with larger. SME:s also gain possibilities along with technologic development. The case with Lingo24 is a great example of how entrepreneurial innovation can create opportunities for growth in SME:s. Allthoug it is a company operating in a business that dosent require huge investments an mentioned above.
I believe that a unique culture in the organization that encourage entrepreneurship can be a source of competitive advantage within a firm according to J.B Barneys well known findings. Another source of competitive advantage that, are familiar to most economists, is the importance of the value chain and value system created by Michael Porter. Both these factors can create better opportunities for smaller firms in any industry. I also believe that small firms can also use networking skills to cooperate with other firms and establish distribution networks. I’ve read articles that highlights the importance of being flexible and knowing the market why collaborations has become important. Especially in production and hardware industries that are capital-intensive. Strong evidence can be found in the fact that OEM-manufacturing has become a possible way for smaller companies in Europe with larger firms and MNC:s.
I do not agree with the position provided by the blog.
ReplyDeleteA small or medium company can’t be as successful as multinational in today’s globalized world. Multinationals have more capital, more resources (…) than SMEs. If SMEs want to become successful in the international scene, they should become a multinational. In that sense, SMEs can’t grab an interesting part of the market share.
In the blog, the authors talk about Lingo24 who «belong now to the flourishing category of micro-multinationals». In that sense, SMEs can’t remain SMEs if they want to become worldwide. It is true that Lingo24 keeps some characteristics of an SME, but the definition of a multinational says that : «A multinational corporation (MNC) or multinational enterprise (MNE)[1] is a corporation enterprise that manages production or delivers services in more than one country» (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multinational_corporation)
I really appreciate the style of the author and the clarity of the expressed idea.
Dear Observateurs,
ReplyDeleteI agree with the idea that SMEs also have a great chance to go global thanks to advanced technologies, strategies that take into account cultural differences and supportive government engagements.
First, concerning the advanced technologies, and the increased accessibility of Internet, I agree on the fact that “it brought with it the advantage of fast information transfer”. To support your ideas, the concept of Cloud Computing appears relevant. Indeed, according to Anthony Chirchirillo, Cloud computing can be presented as the “technology of the future, particularly for SMEs that don't have the deep pockets to invest in IT to grow their businesses”: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ae_DKNwK_ms.
Secondly, I found great that you acknowledge the fact that it is essential for SMEs to have a well-defined strategy concerning the cultural differences. Indeed, if the global market and international customers do not receive appropriately the marketing image of the product or service they are selling, it can cost a lot for SMEs. Thus, I strongly believe that essential advice on local laws and culture can be the difference between success and failure, especially for smaller firms.
However, I think it is essential to acknowledge that SMEs can suffer from two issues: on the one hand, asset limitations and restraints in resources reduce the ability to compete in a global environment; on the other hand, local markets are attacked by powerful international firms.
Finally, I would say that there is no magic recipe for SMEs to go global. Indeed, bankruptcies affect 700 000 SMEs and around 2.8 million jobs every year.
Thank you for such a great article,
New Horizon
I appreciate with your myth but I have different opinion about it. I am not saying that globalization can merely make multinational companies success, but compare with SMEs; globalization makes SMEs more difficult to be success than the multinational enterprises in technology and culture aspect. So, the points, which your team supports that SMEs can be successful due to globalization, could also be used as the explanation of why globalization makes MNCs easier to succeed. First, because of the technological advance, many MNCs have online store, such as Apple and Dell. At the same time, due to the economics of scale, it lowers the production and logistic cost. Thus, MNCs can provide such a convenient and cheap shopping service that SMEs could hardly offer. Besides, globalization minimizes the culture difference. Nowadays, people from different cultures are more willing to accept new things, for example, branches of McDonald and Starbucks spread over South East Asia. It is difficult for SMEs to survive comparatively. Therefore, MNCs have competitive advantage based on technology and culture aspect.
ReplyDeleteI do not agree with the position provided by the blog.
ReplyDeleteA small or medium company can’t be as successful as multinational in today’s globalized world. Multinationals have more capital, more resources (…) than SMEs. If SMEs want to become successful in the international scene, they should become a multinational. In that sense, SMEs can’t grab an interesting part of the market share.
In the blog, the authors talk about Lingo24 who «belong now to the flourishing category of micro-multinationals». In that sense, SMEs can’t remain SMEs if they want to become worldwide. It is true that Lingo24 keeps some characteristics of an SME, but the definition of a multinational says that : «A multinational corporation (MNC) or multinational enterprise (MNE)[1] is a corporation enterprise that manages production or delivers services in more than one country» (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multinational_corporation).
I really appreciate the style of the author and the clarity of the expressed ideas.
I appreciate with your myth but I have different opinion about it. I am not saying that globalization can merely make multinational companies success, but compare with SMEs; globalization makes SMEs more difficult to be success than the multinational enterprises in technology and culture aspect. So, the points, which your team supports that SMEs can be successful due to globalization, could also be used as the explanation of why globalization makes MNCs easier to succeed. First, because of the technological advance, many MNCs have online store, such as Apple and Dell. At the same time, due to the economics of scale, it lowers the production and logistic cost. Thus, MNCs can provide such a convenient and cheap shopping service that SMEs could hardly offer. Besides, globalization minimizes the culture difference. Nowadays, people from different cultures are more willing to accept new things, for example, branches of McDonald and Starbucks spread over South East Asia. It is difficult for SMEs to survive comparatively. Therefore, MNCs have competitive advantage based on technology and culture aspect.
ReplyDeleteHi Observateurs,
ReplyDeleteI like your myth pertaining about only multinationals being able to succeed in todays accelerated pace of globalization. In my personal perspective, I think whether big or small as an organisation and as the tag line of Addidas mentions, “Impossible is nothing”, Yes indeed going global for both a small or medium company is achievable.
If we take a closer look in Asia and see how Chinese companies like Alibaba.com which was founded by Jack Ma and Tudou which were founded by Gary Ma & Marc van de Chijs went global in their area of business which started as an SME of no more than 20 employees then, as compared to today’s employment of over 500 employees.
Yes I do agree that the advancement in technology like the internet and today’s supply chain management system has made business operations closer and connected then before. This has allowed many small-medium enterprises (SME) to achieve far greater international market segments today.
I certainly do also agree with IM_student_51814580 that for SMEs to succeed at this level it certainly varies from industry to industry and the availability of resources at hand. Just to share with you guys about successful SMEs that even went global and set up their operations in China, you could check out this book called: “CHINA ENTREPRENURS” by Juan Antonio Fernandez and Laurie Underwood.
Amidst the entire buzz about being an MNC before going global, I believe strong partnerships are the way to go for organisations whether big or small. We can see from this article: (http://www.spring.gov.sg/NewsEvents/ITN/Pages/Most-SMEs-look-to-China-for-expansion-poll-20110624.aspx)how banks which are a representation of MNCs extend their services and facilities to aid SMEs, to encourage them to go global. So with China as the new number 2 economy of the world, most SMEs around the world could now enjoy better credit lines, banking services and mass markets for them to provide their services and products.
In conclusion, it is indeed possible for SMEs to go global regardless of industry but the key factor to such success is to have a audacious vision and a carefully scaled plan.
It is correct that “SMEs also have a great chance to go global”.
ReplyDeleteBecause of the advanced technology, we can go everywhere easily, we can meet friends from all over the world, we can get the news immediately from the other sides of the world, etc. Technology really helps a lot in our daily life. Technology becomes one of the important components in the GLOBALIZATION. Technology also helps SMEs to explore the world and give them an opportunity to go global!
Nowadays people like to shop online, they always stick to the website and buy the product online. Online shop is an opportunity for the SMEs to go global. The cost of operating an online shop is much cheaper than operate a physical store in foreign countries. As we are new to a foreign market, we may need to concern lots of things, e.g. where to rent, who to employ, etc. When we are operating an online shop, we can just omit these kinds of questions. The cost of making an online store is to develop the website and the maintenance fee. One of the advantages of operating an online store is to lower the loss of entering in the new market. It is common that when a firm fails in entering in a new market, they will lose a huge amount of money. Sometimes, it may led to a firm goes bankrupt. If the sale of the online shop is good, then the SMEs can start to invest a physical store in foreign countries.
Hi Observateurs,
ReplyDeleteTo begin, every company will begin small, even KFC for example had once began in a small town Kentucky where they only had one store. I believe that many companies has the opportunity to expand and diversify their products around the globe nevertheless the size they are, as long as they have the right resources and capital to support their activities. I agree that advanced technology particularly the Internet has been the strongest source to helping companies succeed in the global world today. Starting up a business has been far more easier than before as it is used as a great marketing tool that helps promote companies worldwide. Online trading is usually the easiest route for small businesses to enter the global market, however I think that the success of the business is determined by the companies own core competences and whether they can differentiate their products and services to the competitive market, not the size of the company. For example, recently Groupon has strived to success from first entering a small market to becoming a globally well known business today, by their capability to offer consumers great benefits to their lifestyles. Moreover, I agree that the success of businesses also relies on their capabilities to account for cultural differences as consumer tastes will differ from place to place and time to time. It will definitely be more difficult for smaller companies to cater for a diverse range of consumers due to less capital they have. However, I believe that smaller companies can offer more standardized products to reduce costs, may also be potentially successful globally as long as the product caters for universal needs and perhaps include a touch of uniqueness.
Hi Observateurs,
ReplyDeleteTo begin, every company will begin small, even KFC for example had once began in a small town Kentucky where they only had one store. I believe that many companies has the opportunity to expand and diversify their products around the globe nevertheless the size they are, as long as they have the right resources and capital to support their activities. I agree that advanced technology particularly the Internet has been the strongest source to helping companies succeed in the global world today. Starting up a business has been far more easier than before as it is used as a great marketing tool that helps promote companies worldwide. Online trading is usually the easiest route for small businesses to enter the global market, however I think that the success of the business is determined by the companies own core competences and whether they can differentiate their products and services to the competitive market, not the size of the company. For example, recently Groupon has strived to success from first entering a small market to becoming a globally well known business today, by their capability to offer consumers great benefits to their lifestyles. Moreover, I agree that the success of businesses also relies on their capabilities to account for cultural differences as consumer tastes will differ from place to place and time to time. It will definitely be more difficult for smaller companies to cater for a diverse range of consumers due to less capital they have. However, I believe that smaller companies can offer more standardized products to reduce costs, may also be potentially successful globally as long as the product caters for universal needs and perhaps include a touch of uniqueness.
Dear Observateurs, I think you provide a very special and interesting topic. You clearly stated the reasons that small and medium enterprises (SMEs) can also go globally. It can be seen that many readers disagree that these companies can develop well in a global market. I think the reasons why there are so many disagreements are because there are many other aspects need to be concern. To make your argument more convincing, my suggestion is that you can provide a “SWOT analysis” and compare the advantages and disadvantages of SMEs with MNCs. Furthermore, you can list out the main concern for SMEs going to global market, and then provide some suggestions on how they can tackle these challenges and change them to opportunities. Just like other readers, I have a lot of concerns if SMEs going globally. I’m wondering if a SME expands all over the world, will it become a MNC? Your example is good, but is it a special case or can only be applied on some specific industry? I think if you would like to prove that SMEs can go globally in any industry, you’d better provide more example with explanations. However, if you think it can be applied to specific industries, you’d better point it out, or else it may lead confusion.
ReplyDeleteI want to share a testimony on how Le_Meridian funding service helped me with loan of 2,000,000.00 USD to finance my marijuana farm project , I'm very grateful and i promised to share this legit funding company to anyone looking for way to expand his or her business project.the company is UK/USA funding company. Anyone seeking for finance support should contact them on lfdsloans@outlook.com Or lfdsloans@lemeridianfds.com Mr Benjamin is also on whatsapp 1-989-394-3740 to make things easy for any applicant.
ReplyDelete